When I first took a snapshot of my Ancestry match data, I didn’t bother taking every piece of information available. For example, I didn’t think that the kit administrator info was useful (the “managed by XXX”), but I’ve changed my mind. So before I did a re-run to capture the extra detail I had a look to see what else I’d skipped over.
One piece of information available is the gender of our matches. Visually, the match list pages usually make it very clear by the Pink and Blue headshot graphics.
But it’s not so easy to tell, when the match has uploaded a photo of what looks like a tasty cocktail.
Thankfully, the gender is readily available “behind” the graphics. Every match has a gender tag of “male” or “female” within the web HTML.
It occurred to me that if this setting is user-selected, then it might not always be accurate. I was trying to remember if I ticked a gender box on sign-up, but then I realized that DNA testing companies have the definitive answer – that whole Y chromosome stuff.
So I revisited my August 2018 snapshot of matches and assigned the gender information to each of my matches. I did the same for the kit of a friend of mine. She has twice my matches – as shown in these numbers:
But the gender breakdown is remarkably similar, in that we both have the same proportion of male and female matches.
Unless we’re both outliers, more women than men are testing with Ancestry.
Once I had these numbers, I wondered if there was a difference in gender in the proportion of testers interested in genealogy versus interested solely in ethnic heritage. I have no way of knowing why people test, but I do have metrics on which of my matches have trees. There turned out to be very little gender difference, 28% of men have no tree versus 26% of women.